Re:First new U.S. nuclear reactor since 2016 is now in opera...
by Manuel_D on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @09:40PM
(#38789381)
On a per-MW basis nuclear power dropped in cost during the 1950s. See the small blue dots round the late 1950s and early 60s? Compare that with the cluster of red dots.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:First new U.S. nuclear reactor since 2016 is now in opera...
by wolverine876 on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @11:36PM
(#38790094)
Early, low-hanging fruit?
Re:First new U.S. nuclear reactor since 2016 is now in opera...
by Manuel_D on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @11:38PM
(#38790107)
That, and larger plants. Things like concrete containment vessels have costs relative to the surface area of a hemisphere, while power output scales with the volume. But the big driver was economies of scale. Building multiple copies of the same or similar design means you can have longer production runs of steam generators, pressure vessels, turbines, etc.
Re:First new U.S. nuclear reactor since 2016 is now in opera...
by angiosperm on Thursday December 28, 2023 @01:46AM
(#38790755)
I.e., cost has risen monotonically since the 1950s.
Re:First new U.S. nuclear reactor since 2016 is now in opera...
by Manuel_D on Thursday December 28, 2023 @03:38AM
(#38791338)
Incorrect, it fell from the 1950s through the 1960s.
Re:First new U.S. nuclear reactor since 2016 is now in opera...
by angiosperm on Thursday December 28, 2023 @02:48PM
(#38797737)
I.e., cost has risen monotonically since the '60s. Costs were all over the map in the 50s.
Re:First new U.S. nuclear reactor since 2016 is now in opera...
by pfdietz on Friday December 29, 2023 @10:23AM
(#38805888)
In the early days, vendors didn't know how much NPPs would cost, so they priced them to sell, so they could gain that data. Later prices reflected that experience.
One can view the increase over time of nuclear costs as the replacement of wishful thinking with actual experience.