News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A copy-and-patch JIT compiler for CPython by adrian17 on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @04:27AM (#38780419)
> Ah, so you meant that even all of them including specializing interpreter and copy-and-patch JIT may not give a reasonable speedup. But I think you have missed the fact that specializing interpreter has already landed on 3.11 and provided 10--60% speedup

No, I'm talking compared to the current default production state. Exactly what Brandt said in his talk at around 23:30, and what I observed when building his branch.

Re:A copy-and-patch JIT compiler for CPython by lifthrasiir on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @05:57AM (#38780827)
Then I'm not sure why that would refute the intermediate goal to "enable JIT codegen without sacrificing too much performance" as stated in my initial comment, since the proposed copy-and-patch JIT compiler can't make the impact by itself.