News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Colorado wolf reintroduction to move forward by Teever on Tuesday December 26, 2023 @02:23PM (#38775060)
Is it really so simple?

Hasn't human action had detrimental consequence for the environment? And as such aren't efforts to mitigate or undo those consequences a positive?

If that's the case won't the ranchers just pass along the increased cost of doing business to the consumers so we're all ultimately gonna pay for the actions of people a long time ago, which for better or worse, is just how it goes.

Re:Colorado wolf reintroduction to move forward by peyton on Tuesday December 26, 2023 @02:57PM (#38775420)
I’m a big conservationist and I think it’s much, much wiser to pick and choose the battles. Dogmatism like

> Hasn't human action had detrimental consequence for the environment? And as such aren't efforts to mitigate or undo those consequences a positive?

is too often a tool to steamroll other people.

Re:Colorado wolf reintroduction to move forward by Teever on Tuesday December 26, 2023 @03:49PM (#38775906)
Sure, that may be a good general sort of viewpoint, but does it apply in this situation?
Re:Colorado wolf reintroduction to move forward by 0xbadcafebee on Tuesday December 26, 2023 @02:44PM (#38775302)
If conservatives could dump nuclear waste in streams to save a penny, they'd do it. Asking them to think about their impact on the environment, and how it might come back to impact them, is a non-starter.
Re:Colorado wolf reintroduction to move forward by kmeisthax on Tuesday December 26, 2023 @03:46PM (#38775885)
It depends on the kind of conservative. In blue states, some of them will shout and hollar about, say, how the new nuclear plant is going to pollute the streams with nuclear waste.