Re:Nintendo Network shutdown – The beginning of the end
by YoshiRulz on Tuesday December 26, 2023 @12:57AM
(#38769235)
This is a great idea, but doesn't solve the problem of _game servers_ shutting down.
Re:Nintendo Network shutdown – The beginning of the end
by smaudet on Tuesday December 26, 2023 @03:27AM
(#38769876)
Or even general availability of games...
Purchase a game console, why shouldn't the store remain functional indefinitely?
Yes, I get operating costs for your store front, but the standard should be, _if you are operating a market it should not be yours to control_.
Monopolies are bad in all forms, game stores should be operable by anyone, period.
And yes companies can protect themselves by disqualification of warranty for 3rd party stores, but that should be the consumer's choice, not some arbitrary CEOs decision.
We should buy your product because it offers something worth buying, not because you needed a subscription to bump your numbers...
Re:Nintendo Network shutdown – The beginning of the end
by havan_agrawal on Tuesday December 26, 2023 @02:09AM
(#38769508)
I thought the whole point of download-only games is that they are not borrowable/lendable/resellable, so wouldn't allowing one-time only writes defeat the purpose?
Distributing games via physical copies is already a profit loss compared to distributing them via an online store, and distributing different cartridges per-game means even more supply issues for that specific game. Allowing players to do a one-time burn of the game they purchased to a blank cartridge would mean game companies could sell the game at full price digitally, make an extra sale on the cartridge, and gamers get the security of knowing that if servers were going to be shut down, they'd have the ability to burn the games they care about to physical media and be able to keep playing them. Win win for everyone.