News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Ruby 3.3. Parent comment

Re:Ruby 3.3 by choilive on Monday December 25, 2023 @11:59AM (#38764116)
You're pushing 100Gb/s of JSON (1Mb*100k/s)? AND your calling other services + a DB per request on a single server? I'm skeptical.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ruby 3.3 by jupp0r on Monday December 25, 2023 @12:13PM (#38764254)
The test was local, ie using the loopback interface on a large server.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ruby 3.3 by x86x87 on Monday December 25, 2023 @01:34PM (#38764867)
Are you actually going to the DB or is that json synthetically generated? Is it the same json? What exactly are we testing here?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ruby 3.3 by jupp0r on Monday December 25, 2023 @05:10PM (#38766625)
Sorry I was oversimplifying. Most of the data for the response comes from the db with some API calls for authorization and some auxiliary data. Benchmark was actually hitting the DB. Quite a bit of the 1mb response size is redundant (json-api format).
[ Parent | on HN ]