Aside from that, who cares about loyalty to the CEO of a tech company. He's a replaceable employee and OpenAI should be able to continue without him.
What were his actual crimes. It's not clear from the previous board nor anyone who's spoken about the matter what those were.
Boards don’t judge crimes. And unlike courts, they have no disclosure obligation. Particularly for a private company.
If true, that board deserved to be dissolved privately without being given the courtesy of raising any voices against Sam or OpenAI's future.
This is another one of those recent buzzwords that mean nothing. Like oil conglomerates making "green energy" donations and calling themselves low carbon emitters.
That was not is #1 job as per the charter, that why all this controversy started.
He makes people money. Plenty of terrible people commanded great loyalty. All the loyalty tells you is he’s a good leader. Not where he’s leading us.
(Not saying anything about Sam. Just pointing out that loyalty is orthogonal.)