News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, rep... by seanmcdirmid on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:11AM (#38751777)
Doesn’t Facebook have a report button? I’m pretty sure comments like that would be taken down if you reported them, it’s really a no brainer whatever “them” refers to.
Re:Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, rep... by selcuka on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:18AM (#38751813)
The report button is rather useless unless it's a delicate issue that Facebook wants to distance themselves from. I find it hard to believe that nobody reports such comments. Probably many people do, but they get the stock reply "this comment does not violate our community standards".
Re:Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, rep... by seanmcdirmid on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:32AM (#38751873)
I would be really really surprised if some comment so brazen wasn’t auto deleted on flagging. Saying you want someone to die is very straightforward reason to delete without much thought.
Re:Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, rep... by uoaei on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:36AM (#38751894)
So you're just going to assume the problem doesn't exist because you'd be surprised if it did? There's skepticism, and then there's sticking your head in the sand...
Re:Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, rep... by seanmcdirmid on Sunday December 24, 2023 @12:34PM (#38755038)
You or I could run this test right now on Facebook. I suggest you just post a comment somewhere you in Facebook that you want some person or some group of people to die, it doesn’t really matter who, and measure the amount of time it takes for someone to flag it and have it deleted. This is just low hanging fruit, and completely unrelated to the immediate issue at hand.

My guess is that the original poster is leaving something out in their comment and the post wasn’t as brazen as the comment suggested.

Re:Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, rep... by uoaei on Sunday December 24, 2023 @12:40PM (#38755074)
You're literally just living in a fantasy world. "Trust me bro" has no power compared to actual studies.
Re:Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, rep... by seanmcdirmid on Sunday December 24, 2023 @05:20PM (#38757525)
I meant, you could actually execute the experiment yourself and see what happens. You don’t have to trust me, rather just do it and find out how quickly your comment is nuked. You won’t get into any trouble other than your comment being deleted…probably. The truth is easy to discern by just running the experiment if you want, but I’m guessing you have some cognitive bias that you’d rather have confirmed instead?
Re:Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, rep... by uoaei on Sunday December 24, 2023 @11:09PM (#38759642)
Anyone could say exactly the same thing about any hot-button topic and feel as self-righteous as you. Again, it's fantasy until you back it up with something empirical.
Re:Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, rep... by seanmcdirmid on Monday December 25, 2023 @03:19PM (#38765743)
The experiments are straight forward if someone wants to run them. But your fantasy is backed up by as much evidence as mine, we are arguing about whose anecdote is better until someone does the experiment.
Re:Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, rep... by uoaei on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @08:50PM (#38789061)
My argument is nothing more than that we don't know anything "until someone does the experiment". Stop putting words in my mouth, Sean.
Re:Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, rep... by LtWorf on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:34AM (#38751881)
I reported them, yes. Facebook said they didn't violate policy.
Re:Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, rep... by phatskat on Tuesday December 26, 2023 @06:38AM (#38770891)
One of my local groups has been flooded with porn spam as of late, moderators have abandoned the group (the group was NOT for anything remotely related). I reported the group for spam and for sexually explicit content (I’m talking links with poster images of full on sexual activity, exposed genitalia, etc - the kind of stuff you expect on the homepage of any major porn site). The report was closed without action later that day. Anybody taking two seconds to look at the group would have immediately done _something_, but I’m doubtful that this report ever reached a real person.