FWIW I didn't read snark. I read "I am sad to see…", much as I might be sad to see the history of any other ancient thing forgotten.
A little bit of both, really. But thanks for the charitable reading.
The author took a position on the name’s newness, which implies he did some research.
Blog authors like this remind me of ChatGPT: they write with an affected authoritativeness completely disconnected from the actual value of their words.
This gains them a following in the same sort of way that Donald Trump, Joe Rogan, or Jordan Peterson gain a following.
That’s also sad to see.
I wish you hadn’t phrased it snarkily tho: is it really “sad” that someone doesn’t know an interesting fact that you do, or is it a fun opportunity for others to learn something?