News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:7.1M miles, 3 minor injuries: Waymo's safety data looks good by danans on Thursday December 21, 2023 @11:18AM (#38722444)
> Before jumping to conclusions, are we sure these Waymos hit from behind didn't awkwardly and randomly stop in the middle of a busy intersection (where no sane human driver would)?

I'm nearly certain that I'm alive today because I drove as defensively as something like a Waymo. One day as I was approaching an intersection where I had a green light, I saw a car approaching the same intersection from the cross street at a speed that they couldn't have possibly stopped for their red light.

I instinctively slowed down suddenly and that car, as I predicted , ran the red light at high speed and turned just a few yards in front of me.

If I had been more tired, hasty, or it had been darker out, I might not have seen it or reacted in time. A fully autonomous and defensive driving system wouldn't get tired or hasty, and lidar can see fine at night.

And yes, I might have gotten rear ended, but that's a far better outcome than getting t-boned by a car going 65mph.

Re:7.1M miles, 3 minor injuries: Waymo's safety data looks good by Workaccount2 on Thursday December 21, 2023 @11:22AM (#38722505)
>If I had been more tired, hasty, or it had been darker out, I might not have seen it or reacted in time.

If you had just been an average driver. Most people are terrible at defensive driving.

Re:7.1M miles, 3 minor injuries: Waymo's safety data looks good by danans on Thursday December 21, 2023 @12:09PM (#38723246)
> Most people are terrible at defensive driving.

Mostly because people misunderstand what defensive driving means.

It doesn't mean "go slow". It means always maintain a safety margin between your vehicle and others, adjusted for speed, road conditions, and relative direction of travel.

Those are the kinds of objectives a self driving system can very reliably achieve, unlike a human.