AI cannot be patent 'inventor', UK Supreme Court rules in landmark case

Re:AI cannot be patent 'inventor', UK Supreme Court rules in... by peternilson on Thursday December 21, 2023 @01:13AM (#38717541)

If the A.I can not be rewarded the patent, can it therefore also not be guilty of infringement ?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI cannot be patent 'inventor', UK Supreme Court rules in... by Ekaros on Thursday December 21, 2023 @01:15AM (#38717555)

On other hand it cannot own property or earn money. So it is pretty pointless to sue one...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI cannot be patent 'inventor', UK Supreme Court rules in... by drtgh on Thursday December 21, 2023 @10:44AM (#38721879)

set anti-marketing && anti-neolanguage on:

" If the statistical database prepared by the team can not be rewarded the patent, can the team that configured the data that fed the vectorization of such database therefore also not be guilty of infringement ? "

There is no Johnny5, HAL, Skynet, etc. It is not expected that it will be seen in the coming decades, probably not even in this century at the very least.

[ Parent | on HN ]