Sudo without a setuid binary or SSH over a Unix socket

Re:Sudo without a setuid binary or SSH over a Unix socket by cperciva on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @08:37PM (#38704461)

The original article has load-bearing typography in the title, which was lost when it was posted here.

dang, can you add some punctuation to change the title to "Sudo without a setuid binary; or, SSH over a Unix socket"?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sudo without a setuid binary or SSH over a Unix socket by yuriks on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @09:21PM (#38704736)

I thought so too, but it turns out the load bearing typography is also missing in the blog itself. What do HN rules say in this case?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sudo without a setuid binary or SSH over a Unix socket by Modified3019 on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @09:46PM (#38704874)

Google search has zero results for "load-bearing typography"/"loadbearing typography"/"load bearing typography"

What do you mean by this?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sudo without a setuid binary or SSH over a Unix socket by sproingie on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @09:51PM (#38704905)

It’s a cheeky way of saying that the punctuation is doing a lot of work in making the phrase understandable.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sudo without a setuid binary or SSH over a Unix socket by Modified3019 on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @10:08PM (#38705015)

Ah, that makes more sense. I rather like the phrase.

I got confused because the topic of typography has something called Left/Right Side Bearing, which I guess I was trying to cram together with the implication that page "load"ing was affected somehow.

[ Parent | on HN ]