Re:'e/acc' – Silicon Valley's favorite obscure theory about ...
by malermeister on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @12:30PM
(#38698574)
We should be listening to Marx in these times.
Re:'e/acc' – Silicon Valley's favorite obscure theory about ...
by nickpp on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @05:08PM
(#38702447)
Anybody who tried has starved to death or needed a bloody revolution to get rid of their dictator and his nomenklatura.
Re:'e/acc' – Silicon Valley's favorite obscure theory about ...
by malermeister on Wednesday December 20, 2023 @03:09AM
(#38706429)
Like Allende, who was democratically elected and then couped by the CIA?
Re:'e/acc' – Silicon Valley's favorite obscure theory about ...
by nickpp on Wednesday December 20, 2023 @07:42AM
(#38707965)
Plenty of communist experiments ran unimpeded (a few are even running right now) and they pretty much all had the same predictable miserable ends.
Oh, and to address your earlier point:
> you fine fellow serfs have made this a fertile land for discussion
Yes, the community is where the value is. But we all congregated here and not on some free and open-source place somewhere else on the Internet. So there must also be some value added by the creators and maintainers of this place, value we recognized and built upon.
Re:'e/acc' – Silicon Valley's favorite obscure theory about ...
by thiagoharry on Wednesday December 20, 2023 @02:07PM
(#38712350)
Whether you like it or not, Marx is one of the most important philosophers from XIX century with important contributions to politics, sociology and economy.
Re:'e/acc' – Silicon Valley's favorite obscure theory about ...
by nickpp on Monday December 25, 2023 @06:41AM
(#38761802)
I never said he wasn't important. So was Hitler, btw. Marx's sick ideology just killed more. But I am glad you consider that an important contribution.
Re:'e/acc' – Silicon Valley's favorite obscure theory about ...
by thiagoharry on Monday December 25, 2023 @02:35PM
(#38765413)
No, Hitler was no relevant philosopher and had no widely recognizable contribution to the mentioned areas. It's a pity that ideology prevents people to discuss or even to understand other people's ideas and contributions.
It's not ad hominem to judge a critic's own track record in order to measure the weight of his words. Otherwise we'd end up listening to any little trust fund ideologues with no actual idea about how the world really works, like Marx.