Figma and Adobe are abandoning our proposed merger

Re:Figma and Adobe are abandoning our proposed merger by kpandit on Monday December 18, 2023 @05:24PM (#38689245)

My bad. I was just responding to the parent comment and the comment(by showbug) they were replying to in isolation. Figma is a product I liked and was so terribly disappointed with the news of acquisition by adobe.

Regarding startups, I just did google "define: startup" and in the dictionary definition there has no VC and no exit.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Figma and Adobe are abandoning our proposed merger by porridgeraisin on Monday December 18, 2023 @08:34PM (#38690732)

What the dictionary says is completely irrelevant.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Figma and Adobe are abandoning our proposed merger by codeptualize on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @07:21AM (#38694684)

We can debate definitions and labels but that's not really relevant to the discussion imo, name it whatever you want, what I'm referring to is a company taking VC money to accelerate growth.

Once you take VC money, like Figma did, your goal is a lucrative exit.

It's high risk, high reward. It's a different way to build a company, and it's not really possible to change that once you take that route.

Doesn't mean you have to do this. I am all for building steady profitable private companies that aim for the long run, I think it's a great way to build great companies, but then you should stay far away from VC money, take a lot less risk, have different compensation strategies etc etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Figma and Adobe are abandoning our proposed merger by michaelcampbell on Thursday December 21, 2023 @11:42AM (#38722833)

> It's high risk...

for everyone

> , high reward.

for the owners, solely.

For everyone else, notably generally those that actually produced the thing of value, the reward is that if you're VERY VERY LUCKY, you get to keep your job.

[ Parent | on HN ]