Yes, twice (pretty much within minutes of each other which made sense contextually, but you know that and are trying to muddy the waters) in one of the four threads and nine comments you have left disputing the actual published facts without mentioning you stood to profit from this, which is more than 'proximity to the topic'.

Your weasel words are weasley.

I'm not here to fight but it seems you are, especially as you are attempting to make me look the bad guy in a couple comments with innuendo about the spirit of HN and calling commenters 'the peanut gallery'.

I've made my point and you've rebutted there's no further value in arguing.

> Well he works there and misses out

That's a fine point to make

> hence his ire

Putting your spin on the actions of others is beyond rude

> Your weasel words are weasley.

That's 100% against the HN guidelines and community

I suggest if you wish to disagree then try doing it without being disagreeable