News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NASA study finds life-sparking energy source and molecule... by spenczar5 on Saturday December 16, 2023 @03:10PM (#38667267)
How many exoplanets would you say we have proven have no life? You imply 10^40 exoplanets are known to harbor no life. That is probably vastly more than the number of planets in the observable universe (something in the wide region of 10^20 to 10^25).

Something like 5,000 exoplanets have even been discovered. We can’t cross off many of those as certainly lacking life.

Re:NASA study finds life-sparking energy source and molecule... by superposeur on Saturday December 16, 2023 @03:25PM (#38667374)
I’m certainly not claiming the actual probability is 10^-40 , only using this as an example consistent with an upper limit, which probability would imply life has not arisen a second time in the observable universe. Actually this is way overkill — as you say, even if the probability is as high as 10^-25, life on Earth is still probably the only instance in observable universe. The point is that we have no idea what this all important parameter is.
Re:NASA study finds life-sparking energy source and molecule... by spenczar5 on Saturday December 16, 2023 @03:40PM (#38667470)
Our upper limit is something like 10^-1. After all, there is life on earth! Our lower limit is 10^-25 or so.

Why pick the lower limit? Existence of life on earth is extremely powerful evidence.

Re:NASA study finds life-sparking energy source and molecule... by superposeur on Saturday December 16, 2023 @04:14PM (#38667730)
Ah, but in my opinion we can't call 10^-25 a lower limit since, if life didn't occur in this collection of planets, we wouldn't be here asking the question in the first place!