News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Prompt engineering by CrypticShift on Friday December 15, 2023 @03:21PM (#38658336)
I've been hesitant lately to dedicate a lot of time to learning how to perfect prompts. It appears every new version, not to mention different LLMs (Google's here [1]), responds differently. With the rapid advancement we're seeing, in two year or five, we might not even need such complex prompting as systems get smarter.

[1] : https://ai.google.dev/docs/prompt_intro

Re:Prompt engineering by sanderjd on Friday December 15, 2023 @03:59PM (#38658760)
I know I'm the dummy here because people are doing useful stuff with these techniques, but I don't think I'll ever shake the feeling that this can't possibly be the way forward, that it can only possibly be a short-lived local maximum.

Doesn't this all seem ... kind of silly?

Re:Prompt engineering by barfingclouds on Saturday December 16, 2023 @11:09PM (#38670249)
That’s a good point. I remember in elementary school, our librarians were teaching us how to find information online using some really technical search engine. Maybe called like jstor or something else? They hated google and said you can’t properly filter with it the way you could with theirs. But years later I obviously never heard of the previous one again and used google regularly
Re:Prompt engineering by maxbrydak on Monday December 18, 2023 @04:12PM (#38688359)
JSTOR and other similar are really cool when looking for academic papers tbh