News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WebP is so great except it's not by aidenn0 on Friday December 15, 2023 @12:03PM (#38656060)
The thing that I like the best about jxl is how consistent the reference encoder is. If I need to compress an entire directory of images, cxjl -d 1.0 will generate good looking images at a pretty darn small size.

Using mozjpeg (SPEG), or openjpeg (JPEG 2000) or cwebp, and I want to get even close (in bpp) to what cjxl does on the default I have to use different settings for b&w vs color and line-art vs photos.

Re:WebP is so great except it's not by conaclos on Saturday December 16, 2023 @09:57AM (#38664659)
The last time I checked, it was not possible to re-encode a JXL image into a JPEG image. Is this now supported?
Re:WebP is so great except it's not by aidenn0 on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @01:37AM (#38692565)
It's possible to encode any image format to any other; I'm not sure what they has to do with my comment though