HBO Decides It Still Isn't Difficult Enough To Watch HBO Shows

Re:HBO Decides It Still Isn't Difficult Enough To Watch HBO ... by MartinCron on Thursday April 19, 2012 @01:59PM (#3864263)

Actual example of financial unavailability. One of my wife's favorite kids books, "The 14 bears in summer and winter" was out of print for years. It was a collector classic and was fetching upwards of $300 in the secondary market. We didn't buy a copy, we didn't "pirate" one either.

The publisher saw the high price as proof there was still a demand for the book and produced another printing. We paid full price for it, around 15 bucks, I think. It's a cute book, I'm glad I have it, I wouldn't have wanted to pay $300 for it, though.

One could make the case that if everyone could just "pirate" the book because it was financially unavailable, then the publisher would never bother doing a re-issue.

More broadly, I think that respecting copyright holders (and the rule of law) means that sometimes you don't get exactly what you want exactly when you want it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:HBO Decides It Still Isn't Difficult Enough To Watch HBO ... by guard-of-terra on Thursday April 19, 2012 @05:14PM (#3865183)

That's hypothetical losses. Maybe losses. As in, Maybe they lose from piracy, maybe not.

But your win in wealth is real. You can't compare Maybe losses with real wealth gain. Real wins.

Secondary market brings the copyright holder nothing, so it's a bad example.

[ Parent | on HN ]