News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on LoRA Adaptors for Precise Control in Diffusion Models. Parent comment

Re:LoRA Adaptors for Precise Control in Diffusion Models by tracerbulletx on Wednesday December 13, 2023 @11:16PM (#38637712)
It unironically absolutely does not. Source: every visual artist that's spent the last 20 years slowly improving their work.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LoRA Adaptors for Precise Control in Diffusion Models by bee_rider on Thursday December 14, 2023 @12:33AM (#38638168)
FWIW I don’t think they are defending AI by saying that it takes more effort than drawing to make an “intentionally innovative” image.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LoRA Adaptors for Precise Control in Diffusion Models by Der_Einzige on Thursday December 14, 2023 @03:44AM (#38639210)
The person you’re responding to is a titan in their field. Check yourself before you try to check others.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LoRA Adaptors for Precise Control in Diffusion Models by MrScruff on Thursday December 14, 2023 @04:42AM (#38639551)
How do you know the background/experience of the person you're responding to? And even if the person you're claiming has authority here were the worlds leading expert on generative AI, that wouldn't make them authorative on the difficulty of drawing an intentionally innovative image from scratch.

Regardless, the original comment was clearly not serious.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LoRA Adaptors for Precise Control in Diffusion Models by minimaxir on Thursday December 14, 2023 @11:59AM (#38643671)
tbh I don't consider myself a titan in the field but I appreciate the complement :)

I don't get paid enough to be a titan.

[ Parent | on HN ]