News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Promises Unlimited Storage; Cancels; Tells Journal... by frognumber on Wednesday December 13, 2023 @10:10PM (#38637331)
I don't feel at all bad about throttling mobile data.

For reference, the standard scam before was to offer $40/month for e.g. 1GB of data. At that point, you'd pay a crazy amount for each additional MB of data. This was horrible with very fast data, where you could accidentally burn through the whole quota with a misclick e.g. grabbing a large download.

Unlimited with throttle is super-friendly in comparison. I need data in case of an emergency -- enough to send and get emails and have GPS. I don't need 4k video streaming in an emergency. I don't want a $1000 bill for that. It keeps me in a sensible position, without requiring unlimited liability for the carrier.

Re:Google Promises Unlimited Storage; Cancels; Tells Journal... by godelski on Wednesday December 13, 2023 @10:26PM (#38637421)
Oh, I actually appreciate unlimited with throttle. They've always had data caps too but I wouldn't be surprised if the average user knew about them. But maybe the overage plan manager did because Fi is niche? And sorry, I was just bringing up Fi as an example of something being unlimited since so many people were acting like nothing is.
Re:Google Promises Unlimited Storage; Cancels; Tells Journal... by frognumber on Thursday December 14, 2023 @04:55AM (#38639626)
Well, no. Fi is not unlimited. This is how it works.

My cell network (not Fi) has crazy fast internet (I'd throttle it if I could, t avoid overusing it).

If I go over some amount, it goes to 3G speeds (probably 200kbps or similar).

If I were to run at 3G speeds -- continuously, peak speed -- for a month, I couldn't e.g. hit a terabit of data. Ergo, there is a cap, and it's short of 100GB. You cannot get to 100GB be because of the throttle.

I think this is very good behavior, but it is capped.