Re:US agency will not reinstate $900M subsidy for SpaceX Sta...
by 2devnull on Wednesday December 13, 2023 @12:36PM
(#38630916)
Perhaps not billion dollar, but shouldn’t it give some participation trophies? How else to entice innovation in certain areas, especially when the interest rates are killing small tech outfits.
Re:US agency will not reinstate $900M subsidy for SpaceX Sta...
by lolbase on Wednesday December 13, 2023 @01:41PM
(#38632125)
No, it should not.
Re:US agency will not reinstate $900M subsidy for SpaceX Sta...
by intrasight on Wednesday December 13, 2023 @04:08PM
(#38634149)
Agreed. The FCC shouldn't be giving out any funds. They should stick to their role as regulator. Starlink as a properly grounded libertarian outfit should have lobbied to have any subsidy role by the FCC discontinued. Starlink should have just competed in the broadband marketplace - as should have everyone else. In such a level playing field, I think Starlink would do just fine.
Re:US agency will not reinstate $900M subsidy for SpaceX Sta...
by jsight on Wednesday December 13, 2023 @05:48PM
(#38635294)
I agree with this. But we have to operate in the world that exists and not necessarily the one that we wish to exist.
Re:US agency will not reinstate $900M subsidy for SpaceX Sta...
by fomine3 on Thursday December 14, 2023 @01:37AM
(#38638479)
LEO space is a limited global resource. I think government should regulate (and sometimes subsidy) to avoid it become a private company's suck.
Re:US agency will not reinstate $900M subsidy for SpaceX Sta...
by intrasight on Friday December 15, 2023 @11:25AM
(#38655671)
> I think government should regulate
That would just move it from private company suck to nation-state suck. It needs to be regulated by the International Telecommunication Union (UN).
There’s a set of metrics to meet. Starlink is moving the wrong way against those metrics. As such, they’ll need to succeed unaided in the marketplace, instead of getting a government handout.