News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GM says it's dropping Apple CarPlay and Android Auto beca... by fl7305 on Wednesday December 13, 2023 @02:27AM (#38623778)
> infotainment systems are underpowered, because they’re considered an afterthought.

Also, cars sell in the millions. Car manufacturers will redesign a circuit board if it will save them cents on each board.

So it is always a struggle to put a more powerful CPU in there.

Re:GM says it's dropping Apple CarPlay and Android Auto beca... by jimmaswell on Wednesday December 13, 2023 @08:43PM (#38636791)
Infotainment responsiveness needs to be a NHTSA regulation. The mental load of dealing with laggy and unresponsive radios is surely causing accidents. Even if at worst it adds another $100 to the cost of the car to get a good enough cpu, so what?
Re:GM says it's dropping Apple CarPlay and Android Auto beca... by sbierwagen on Thursday December 14, 2023 @12:33AM (#38638162)
Apple made a computer with a fast, responsive UI in 1984 using a chip that ran at 7.8 mhz and had 128 kb of ram.

You don't need a fast chip to eliminate lag. It's just incompetence.

Re:GM says it's dropping Apple CarPlay and Android Auto beca... by fl7305 on Thursday December 14, 2023 @02:12AM (#38638649)
Sure. I've used home computers since 1979. The graphics were instantaneous back then even on a few MHz and 16 kBytes of RAM.

We don't want slow and laggy UIs because the software is bloated.

But I responded to this part:

> The real issue is that the infotainment systems are underpowered

And my point was that it is far harder than it seems to put more powerful CPUs in cars.

Re:GM says it's dropping Apple CarPlay and Android Auto beca... by jonathankoren on Thursday December 14, 2023 @01:47PM (#38645355)
They weren't doing that much either. I doubt an Apple ][ could even stream modern audio codecs via bluetooth, let alone simultaneously run a local search on the GPS database.