you seem to adhere to the intellectual norms of the great leap forward rather than those of science or philosophy
in science nobody ever has to 'prove they've already sufficiently criticized' anyone or anything
they just provide evidence
enjoy your auto-da-fe but please do it somewhere else, only involving people who are into that kind of thing
Because after that academia made it the gold standard of research in most disciplines, leading to what many describe as a "replication crisis" in social sciences.
But surely anyone criticizing him for that would have to prove they've already sufficiently criticized him for the whole eugenics thing.