Re:SpaceX's next Starship flight could test refueling tech
by angiosperm on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @05:02PM
(#38619296)
Apollo 1 was very much not production hardware. "The Vintage Space" channel on YT has a good rundown, "Duplicate Apollo Spacecraft". They didn't lose any crew on production hardware, although 13 was close.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SpaceX's next Starship flight could test refueling tech
by mulmen on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @05:32PM
(#38619642)
AS-204 was absolutely production hardware. The later hardware was different because three people died. They died in rehearsal for an actual mission.
> Apollo 1, initially designated AS-204, was planned to be the first crewed mission of the Apollo program.
Re:SpaceX's next Starship flight could test refueling tech
by angiosperm on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @05:53PM
(#38619920)
The second version was already starting production when three people died. There was never any intention to build any more of the first one, or to send it beyond low Earth orbit.
Re:SpaceX's next Starship flight could test refueling tech
by mulmen on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @06:59PM
(#38620660)
Changes were made based on the fire. The capsule was “production” in the sense that it was going to carry people. It doesn’t need to be mass produced to be “prod”. It’s prod like “this instance matters”.
Re:SpaceX's next Starship flight could test refueling tech
by angiosperm on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @07:51PM
(#38621175)
Apollo 1 should have been production like it mattered. But instead the first prototype was pressed into service because the real one wasn't ready yet. The fire was proof.
Re:SpaceX's next Starship flight could test refueling tech
by mulmen on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @08:44PM
(#38621603)
“In service” and “production” are synonymous in this case.
Re:SpaceX's next Starship flight could test refueling tech
by angiosperm on Friday December 15, 2023 @01:50PM
(#38657217)
Not as it turned out.