News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Epic vs. Google: Google Loses by cyberax on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @01:20PM (#38616140)
> If you go this route, not all roads would have belonged to Apple.

Yes, some backwoods roads would belong to Android. Maybe around 30%.

> If you're a business, why would you care for 30%?

Because it's a lot. Apple is triple-dipping:

1. You have to pay for Apple computers.

2. You have to pay for the SDKs.

3. You have to give the MAFIA shakedown 30%.

Re:Epic vs. Google: Google Loses by skydhash on Wednesday December 13, 2023 @04:03PM (#38634096)
> Yes, some backwoods roads would belong to Android.

There are good manufacturers for Android. But they're still unmatched in terms of services. In the above analogy, nice road, worse travel experience.

> Because it's a lot.

It's the cost of doing business with Apple, made clear to you since you begin. You just factor it in your offering.

> 1. You have to pay for Apple computers.

Because it's the tool for the job. No ones expect you to build a Windows App without a computer running Windows. The tools Apple provides only run on MacOS which only runs on Macs.

> 2. You have to pay for the SDKs

You don't. You're paying only for access to the distribution channel (base fee).

> You have to give the MAFIA shakedown 30%

Remember the tools and services above? If you're making business with Apple customers through Apple services, you're paying for it on a transaction basis.

Re:Epic vs. Google: Google Loses by cyberax on Wednesday December 13, 2023 @05:36PM (#38635172)
> There are good manufacturers for Android. But they're still unmatched in terms of services. In the above analogy, nice road, worse travel experience.

Again, it doesn't matter if roads are nice. Or if your mafia thugs give you a handkerchief after they beat you bloody.

> It's the cost of doing business with Apple, made clear to you since you begin. You just factor it in your offering.

Just like mafia.

> No ones expect you to build a Windows App without a computer running Windows.

Can I buy macOS to run on my PC? No?

> You don't. You're paying only for access to the distribution channel (base fee).

Since you mentioned Windows, I can compile and distribute as many Windows applications as I want. Without paying a cent to MS.

> Remember the tools and services above? If you're making business with Apple customers through Apple services, you're paying for it on a transaction basis.

Again, like with mafia. But now on iPhone!