News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chrome 19 doesn't respect basic auth details embedded in ... by vivekjishtu on Thursday April 19, 2012 @01:40AM (#3861570)
What if I send it over https https://foo:[email protected]/basic-auth/foo? I don't think it should be insecure in this case.
Re:Chrome 19 doesn't respect basic auth details embedded in ... by sausagefeet on Thursday April 19, 2012 @01:49AM (#3861593)
I think the concern is making the user look like another URL you trust.
[deleted]
Re:Chrome 19 doesn't respect basic auth details embedded in ... by sern on Thursday April 19, 2012 @01:46AM (#3861581)
This is incorrect. https encrypts everything.
Re:Chrome 19 doesn't respect basic auth details embedded in ... by dudus on Thursday April 19, 2012 @02:03AM (#3861638)
Compression is done only on the body not on the headers. But HTTPS encryption is done in the whole connection.
Re:Chrome 19 doesn't respect basic auth details embedded in ... by skeletonjelly on Thursday April 19, 2012 @01:52AM (#3861601)
Are you sure? I just did a quick test with Fiddler and didn't see the credentials there. I only see them when I enable HTTPS decryption.
Re:Chrome 19 doesn't respect basic auth details embedded in ... by chris_wot on Thursday April 19, 2012 @02:10AM (#3861654)
RFC 2818 says the following:

   Conceptually, HTTP/TLS is very simple. Simply use HTTP over TLS
   precisely as you would use HTTP over TCP.
TLS is meant to be transparent to the higher level protocol - in other words, independent of HTTP. The headers should be encrypted also.

For a long time, I also believed that the URL would not be encrypted (e.g. GET /example/url.htm), but as it's running as a transparent connection then this is also encrypted. I had to check this to see if GET requests with session IDs would be vulnerable over the wire - I was quite relieved when I realised my assumptions were wrong! Also meant I had to read a few specs :-)

Re:Chrome 19 doesn't respect basic auth details embedded in ... by drivebyacct2 on Thursday April 19, 2012 @02:06AM (#3861651)
As an aside, everyone has blidnspots and continuing to downvote howardr does nothing but make you feel better about yourself. This bloke's total karma is down to '2' and I'm betting it's much higher than that minus this post.