Ask HN: Can we do better than Git for version control?

Re:Ask HN: Can we do better than Git for version control? by Noneofya on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @07:16AM (#38611211)

>Most of this was built by Microsoft to work on Windows with git.

Hacking git into something it is not does not qualify as learning to cope with git in my book.

Apparently git does not solve all problems and there is indeed value in exploring other options and building new systems that fill other niches.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: Can we do better than Git for version control? by withinboredom on Wednesday December 13, 2023 @05:51AM (#38625498)

umm. it's still git. Git is basically content-addressable storage with a couple of layers on top (heads/tags/trees) which is itself content-addressable storage. If you can offload that storage to a remote, you still have git... and can use git as you've always used git. The tricky part is making it feel like the storage is local and your own, instead of shared.

You only need this when, well, you need it. You can go a surprisingly long way (nearly a decade of daily commits by hundreds of programmers) and stick to vanilla git.

[ Parent | on HN ]