Re:Columbia and NYU Would Lose $327M in Tax Breaks Under Pro...
by Wowfunhappy on Sunday December 10, 2023 @07:41PM
(#38596472)
You're allowed to not like the school, but I don't think any of that amounts to operating like a for-profit organization.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Columbia and NYU Would Lose $327M in Tax Breaks Under Pro...
by alephnerd on Sunday December 10, 2023 @08:05PM
(#38596587)
I agree it is not a for-profit institution, but I assume the commentator is using "for profit" in the colloquial manner for "non-profit that is charging exorbitant amounts".
Pedantry and HN - name a more classic combo
Re:Columbia and NYU Would Lose $327M in Tax Breaks Under Pro...
by Wowfunhappy on Sunday December 10, 2023 @08:18PM
(#38596656)
I think the distinction is relevant if we're discussing whether they deserve non-profit tax breaks.
"Their tuition is expensive" isn't a good reason to exclude them from the tax break. "They are abusing their non-profit status to basically operate as a for-profit corporation" would be a good reason, but I don't think it's true.
Re:Columbia and NYU Would Lose $327M in Tax Breaks Under Pro...
by 11217mackem on Sunday December 10, 2023 @10:55PM
(#38597497)
"Their tuition is expensive" – i.e. their fee structure excludes most American families from even having the university in their child's consideration set – is a valid reason to have them pay taxes, actually.