News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: WarpBuild – x86-64 and arm GitHub Action runners... by jeanregisser on Saturday December 09, 2023 @02:46AM (#38579652)
I’m currently evaluating Buildjet. I’m curious about this caching issue. Were you using actions/cache or buildjet/cache?

https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions/docs/guides/migratin...

Re:Show HN: WarpBuild – x86-64 and arm GitHub Action runners... by suryao on Saturday December 09, 2023 @05:46AM (#38580687)
You can continue to use actions/cache if using WarpBuild :)
Re:Show HN: WarpBuild – x86-64 and arm GitHub Action runners... by clintonb on Saturday December 09, 2023 @11:25AM (#38583180)
We used BuildJet cache for months. It’s possible it was always broken and I only noticed a few days ago. I tried both and neither actually cached data. I even tried forking, and upgrading, the BuildJet variant to no avail.

I spent a solid couple hours trying to fix this before moving to WarpBuild.