Re:High Court rules that Getty vs. Stability AI case can pro...
by naet on Saturday December 09, 2023 @12:48AM
(#38579005)
There's a massive jump in that logic, which is basically equating a large neural net to being exactly the same as a singular human being. If you ask me that is clearly not the case. They operate in entirely different ways and have very different properties.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:High Court rules that Getty vs. Stability AI case can pro...
by prvc on Saturday December 09, 2023 @01:15AM
(#38579153)
>There's a massive jump in that logic, which is basically equating a large neural net to being exactly the same as a singular human being.
It does not assume that.
Re:High Court rules that Getty vs. Stability AI case can pro...
by CamperBob2 on Saturday December 09, 2023 @01:10AM
(#38579134)
Are you willing to give up this point of view the first time you fail a Turing test? It seems only fair.