News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ancient stars made extraordinarily heavy elements, resear... by philipkglass on Friday December 08, 2023 @02:30PM (#38573115)
Isn't it the case it is currently not possible to create any neutron heavy isotopes and that causes the half-lives to be on the low end?

All of these isotopes are neutron-heavy. Lawrencium 261 has 103 protons and 158 neutrons, for example.

In fact, the only stable isotopes with fewer neutrons than protons are helium 3 and ordinary hydrogen (protium).

Re:Ancient stars made extraordinarily heavy elements, resear... by saalweachter on Friday December 08, 2023 @05:05PM (#38575217)
I think he's referring to the way that eg lawrencium has a half-life that ~increases with the neutrons in the isotopes we've produced, from seconds for Lr-256 to hours for Lr-266.

It isn't crazy to postulate, as a layman, that if we synthesized Lr-276, say, it might have a longer half-life.

(Not that we expect that pattern to continue indefinitely, but still, have we discovered the most stable isotope of lawrencium yet?)