News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re: by swyx on Thursday December 07, 2023 @09:11PM (#38564564)
the sheer volume of content creator speculation based on a "leak" of a single letter of the alphabet from openai connected to "clues" all self referentially feeding themselves into a media frenzy based on absolutely no other confirmatory information from openai... could provide enough training data for GPT5.

as a writer this scares me bc of how un-self-aware every q* anon seems to be right now. how many times have i myself been in this position?

Re: by Nthringas on Thursday December 07, 2023 @09:23PM (#38564636)
ah, so your comment leads me to conclude that this is part of some hype marketing campaign to get high-level investors to throw money at openAI

...which faintly smells rotten because of them "lack of a moat" arguments

Re: by swyx on Thursday December 07, 2023 @09:26PM (#38564656)
if you genuinely think either of your sentences is an accurate world model, i think you are miscalibrated.
Re: by Nthringas on Thursday December 07, 2023 @09:37PM (#38564737)
I'm most certainly calibrated differntly than you

what I actually think is way crazier than that. if you asked me (which you didn't) I'd say that I think that behind the scenes what all these llm and ai companies are doing is licensing chinese tech

i regard the timing for the openai fiasco right after the apec meeting in sf as too good for this all to be true

Re: by stevenhuang on Thursday December 07, 2023 @10:05PM (#38564969)
That sounds even more miscalibrated