Re:Sorry, but a new prompt for GPT-4 is not a paper
by starbugs on Tuesday December 05, 2023 @06:33PM
(#38538434)
Look, the burden of proof in a scientific paper is on the authors. Not on me.
A company with a proprietary product that says something is not acceptable evidence in a scientific context. No need to allege that anyone is lying. Lying is irrelevant. What's relevant is that the research is falsifiable. It cannot be falsifiable if you don't know what the actual model is at a given point in time.
A company with a proprietary product that says something is not acceptable evidence in a scientific context. No need to allege that anyone is lying. Lying is irrelevant. What's relevant is that the research is falsifiable. It cannot be falsifiable if you don't know what the actual model is at a given point in time.