Re:A High Frequency Trader's Apologia, Part 1
by anonDataUser on Tuesday April 17, 2012 @01:44PM
(#3853952)
FYI - I wrote the successor to posit. Point in time matching goes out of fad when volatility increases. Why take on the risk of executing a block at a single point in time when you can spread that risk out over the day?
Re:A High Frequency Trader's Apologia, Part 1
by zzleeper on Tuesday April 17, 2012 @01:00PM
(#3853610)
I read somewhere that non-hft tend to trade much more at the "second" tick. This may have been b/c they were dumb (hard to believe) or because converging at the same time (15:30:10 instead of 15:30:10.175) gives them better chances to finding a match to their sell/buy position
Re:A High Frequency Trader's Apologia, Part 1
by MarkPNeyer on Wednesday April 18, 2012 @01:20AM
(#3856634)
what exactly is 'true price discovery' ?
can a price be false?
Re:A High Frequency Trader's Apologia, Part 1
by roel_v on Wednesday April 18, 2012 @09:19AM
(#3857748)
With insufficient trades, you cannot know if a certain price is really what the 'market' wants to pay, just what that one person at one point in time wanted to pay. Overgeneralized, the more trades, the more accurate the price gets.
Re:A High Frequency Trader's Apologia, Part 1
by ChristianMarks on Tuesday April 17, 2012 @04:41PM
(#3854885)
Evidently you have childlike trust in the capacity of the second-tier Russian mathematicians and physicists to get the boundary conditions right.
You can scheme up any number of possible microstructures that sound interesting on the surface. There's a reason why none exist. Remember, there is nothing to stop you from implementing a time-discretized market place. Current regulations (Reg-ATS) allow for you to do so. You'll find it hard to compete. Some markets do perform large scale discretization for block orders. Read up on POSIT and related ATSs and dark pools.