News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Potential of the Julia programming language for high energy physics computing. Parent comment

Re:Potential of the Julia programming language for high ener... by tamasgal on Monday December 04, 2023 @12:53PM (#38520505)
I have no idea what kind of problems you have ;) I use Revise.jl on a daily basis and it works flawlessly. I don't have any comparable workflow in any other language I work with on a daily basis. I wish I could do this style in those as well...

Yes, you should give it a go (again)!

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Potential of the Julia programming language for high ener... by staunton on Monday December 04, 2023 @10:34PM (#38526797)
I'm not sure how Revise would work with a notebook though... Guess it's only useful in the REPL, which is a different way to work.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Potential of the Julia programming language for high ener... by bobbylarrybobby on Monday December 04, 2023 @11:03PM (#38526964)
In VSCode, in an ordinary Julia file you can place the magic comments `# %%` at the start of a code cell (needs to be on its own line), and then you can send these “cells” to the REPL to execute. No notebook needed.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Potential of the Julia programming language for high ener... by staunton on Tuesday December 05, 2023 @12:01AM (#38527300)
What do you do with it? Especially that benefits from Revise?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Potential of the Julia programming language for high ener... by jampekka on Tuesday December 05, 2023 @10:33AM (#38532164)
For example these: https://timholy.github.io/Revise.jl/stable/limitations/#Limi...
[ Parent | on HN ]