Re:You don't need JavaScript for that
by yakshaving_jgt on Saturday December 02, 2023 @08:11AM
(#38498384)
> As a professional developer
This qualifier probably applies to >90% of this website’s audience, so I don’t think it’s useful.
Using less power if you can get away with it is absolutely sensible. If my implementation is suitably robust without the use of type families, data kinds, singletons, lenses, etc., then that’s a more economic solution.
This qualifier probably applies to >90% of this website’s audience, so I don’t think it’s useful.
Using less power if you can get away with it is absolutely sensible. If my implementation is suitably robust without the use of type families, data kinds, singletons, lenses, etc., then that’s a more economic solution.