Return to office is 'dead,' Stanford economist says

Re:Return to office is 'dead,' Stanford economist says by bluGill on Friday December 01, 2023 @02:09PM (#38490843)

Those conference rooms are often where you learn about unstated requirements. Or the real requirement that they assuemed was too hard to asked for so they put in something that would accept that they thought was easier (even though the real requirement is easier). That is also where you learn when the company is shifting directions and so you can start doing what the company really wants.

All of the above can be avoided with remote work. However it is a lot easier to pick those things up in the office.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Return to office is 'dead,' Stanford economist says by j0hnyl on Friday December 01, 2023 @04:39PM (#38492824)

I don't completely agree here, but there is some merit to what you are saying with regards to honing on some social cues, gossip, candor, etc. However, I'd still take being in the dark on some of this stuff in exchange for all the benefits of working from home.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Return to office is 'dead,' Stanford economist says by bluGill on Friday December 01, 2023 @05:03PM (#38493128)

You can skip all that even when in the office. However you run into real danger of getting fired because you are producing things that they don't need.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Return to office is 'dead,' Stanford economist says by LtWorf on Saturday December 02, 2023 @06:37AM (#38497877)

That is when you point to the ticket description and ask "where does it diverge from this description?"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Return to office is 'dead,' Stanford economist says by johnnyanmac on Saturday December 02, 2023 @08:45AM (#38498574)

I'm sure most would too. But this is more about worker efficiency than personal desires. People who say they lose zero productivity in every stage of work lose some credance when the underlying narrative incentivizes them to say that.

[ Parent | on HN ]