I'm actually making a prediction, and not a judgement. Nobody would say I'm a member of the Lisp community, whatever that might mean. But I have seen people get landed on pretty viciously for this kind of formatting before, and if you want participation from a community you should abide the community's standards, even if they are irrational.

Even if the point is to write Algolish code, formatting it like this is likely to earn scorn rather than appreciation.

On the other hand, if you want participation from the Algol-descendant community, who frequently scorn the Lisp community's formatting, that may be exactly the right decision to make to get them familiar with Lisp-like syntax and worry about teaching them the more standard Lisp-community formatting conventions later.

That's a really good point.

> and if you want participation from a community you should abide the community's standards, even if they are irrational.

I don't think he's going to get much participation from the lisp community, but then again, everybody else is a much bigger community. So who knows, maybe the power of lisp combined with a non-lispy syntax is a balloon that can fly.

> So who knows, maybe the power of lisp combined with a non-lispy syntax is a balloon that can fly.

Sounds like Apple's old language Dylan, and perhaps the Julia language: http://www.johnmyleswhite.com/notebook/2012/03/31/julia-i-lo...

You are totally right! That's what I meant!