News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Return to office is 'dead,' Stanford economist says by tnel77 on Friday December 01, 2023 @10:38AM (#38487974)
It undeniably takes more effort for me to reach out via Slack than it does for me to swing by a cubicle. Maybe I have gotten lucky with my experience, but I plan on continuing to mentor new hires. It’s certainly possible that I’ll change my opinion as I get a larger sample pool, but I’m happy with the experience so far.
Re:Return to office is 'dead,' Stanford economist says by convolvatron on Friday December 01, 2023 @10:46AM (#38488092)
I used to kind of think this, but for me reaching out slack has turned into something I really appreciate. I can asynchronously ask someone to get in touch with me. they do when they are ready. i dont interrupt them. i can continue doing other things. there is no set meeting time, we can just have a little chat with zero effort, say goodbye and go back to work.

at the end of the day after doing this I do feel more tired, but I get plenty of self-scheduled productive little discussions.

Re:Return to office is 'dead,' Stanford economist says by away271828 on Friday December 01, 2023 @11:07AM (#38488299)
I've mentored someone remotely and it seems to have gone pretty well. Doesn't hurt that they person is very good. And, yes, chat is invaluable.

I still feel you're losing something without in-person (including social) interaction. I know for me personally, I would say I have much weaker connections to many people I've never met in person. That said, there are a bunch of other factors involved with building new connections as well that aren't purely about being virtual.