A reality bending mistake in Apple's computational photography

Re:A reality bending mistake in Apple's computational photog... by doctoboggan on Thursday November 30, 2023 @11:22PM (#38483096)

I don't think this is true, Apple hasn't openly said they do this level of manipulation (although that doesn't mean they don't necessarily), and I don't think the range of motions she would have to go through would be possible within a single capture. Even with "Live Photos" this wouldn't happen.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A reality bending mistake in Apple's computational photog... by tiltowait on Thursday November 30, 2023 @11:27PM (#38483127)

I’m also skeptical. I want it to be true, because it’s pretty wild, but it seems a little too perfect. I suppose people must already be trying to prove or disprove it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A reality bending mistake in Apple's computational photog... by nickelpro on Friday December 01, 2023 @06:55AM (#38485772)

Ya the uncritical acceptance of these very non-technical articles on HN is a little disappointing

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A reality bending mistake in Apple's computational photog... by dfxm12 on Friday December 01, 2023 @10:14AM (#38487648)

I think you have unrealistic expectations for this community.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A reality bending mistake in Apple's computational photog... by _maelstrom on Saturday December 02, 2023 @04:52PM (#38502414)

The article says it was a panorama photo, which makes it much less interesting than live/hdr creating the same effect.

[ Parent | on HN ]