News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla Cybertruck Pricing and Specs by shepherdjerred on Thursday November 30, 2023 @07:55PM (#38481522)
> Or is it only OK when Tesla does it?

There's no reason to assume I'm biased towards Tesla here.

If any carmaker wanted to say "our car is X% more efficient, and the average person could reasonably expect to save $Y", and then discount that from the sticker price, I would be okay with that.

I don't think it's deceptive at all as long as the estimate is reasonable, and as long as there is clear communication about the sticker price vs the price after savings.

Re:Tesla Cybertruck Pricing and Specs by callalex on Thursday November 30, 2023 @08:34PM (#38481857)
Then where do you draw the line? I, and almost the entire developed world, draws the line at price = number of currency units required to leave the store with the item for sale. Every car could otherwise claim a deduction because it’s more fuel efficient than a sports car or a Rolls Royce or an F-350. And some cars don’t need as expensive of tires, should they claim that deduction? What about cars that are 2 wheel drive, there’s lots of savings there over 4 wheel drive…
Re:Tesla Cybertruck Pricing and Specs by shepherdjerred on Thursday November 30, 2023 @09:52PM (#38482457)
I mentioned this in another comment: something like EnergyGuide [0] would be great for this case, that way manufacturers like Tesla could more easily and consistently communicate how their vehicles have a lower cost of ownership.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EnergyGuide

I also want to say, if Tesla was doing this in some shady way, e.g. not offering an easy way to view the true purchase price, or making unfair comparisons, I would be totally against what they're doing.

Re:Tesla Cybertruck Pricing and Specs by chung8123 on Thursday November 30, 2023 @08:23PM (#38481752)
That is not the price of the vehicle. If anything the price should be more because the three year cost of the vehicle is more than the initial price.