Re:From idea to replacing full-time salary in 4 months
by mseebach on Monday April 16, 2012 @08:36AM
(#3847073)
Yes, I understand the principle. But deciding to form a coop, hiring a manager/marketer and being a partner in a company are all skills, and while valuable, they're just just as arbitrary to decide to teach in schools as knowing how to build a vacuum cleaner.
Also, where is the evidence of exploitation? Does this guy make more money than he would if there was profit-sharing? Paying a salary is profit sharing.
Re:From idea to replacing full-time salary in 4 months
by paulhauggis on Monday April 16, 2012 @02:35PM
(#3848646)
His point is that the owner shouldn't be getting any more than the workers. IE, they are all "equal".
This sounds strangely familiar...
Re:From idea to replacing full-time salary in 4 months
by ricardobeat on Monday April 16, 2012 @10:53PM
(#3850784)
I don't recall saying anything like that. Don't worry, I'm not going to eat your children.
If I had the means to build a vacuum cleaner (not that hard, you know software can be way more complex than that), but instead sold my project to Dyson, because they have the means to produce and market it, yes, I'm setting myself up to be exploited. It's an option. (drifting off-topic, but crowdfunding is changing that too)