News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Extracting Training Data from ChatGPT. Parent comment

Re:Extracting Training Data from ChatGPT by xp84 on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @04:49PM (#38465800)
Yup, though a lot of people are acting now as though every already-established principle of fair use needs to be revised suddenly by adding a bunch of "...but if this is done by any form of AI, then it's copyright infringement."

A cover band who plays Beatles songs = great An artist who paints you a picture in the style of so-and-so = great

An AI who is trained on Beatles songs and can write new ones = exploitative, stealing, etc. An AI who paints you a picture in the style of so-and-so = get the pitchforks, Big Tech wants to kill art!

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Extracting Training Data from ChatGPT by blitzar on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @05:15PM (#38466040)
> A cover band who plays Beatles songs

Has to pay the Beatles for the pleasure of doing so.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Extracting Training Data from ChatGPT by whstl on Thursday November 30, 2023 @04:50AM (#38471614)
This discussion about art "in the style of" being stealing or exploitative hasn't started with AI. For quite some time there has been complaints of advertisements commissioning sound-alike tunes to avoid paying licensing. AI is only automating it and making it possible in an industrial scale.
[ Parent | on HN ]