Re:Trivy: The all-in-one open source security scanner
by jonfw on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @03:53PM
(#38465154)
I would kill for an all-in-one solution where I work... today we use a different scanner for every single type of scan we perform, and it's a nightmare to programmatically analyze the results.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Trivy: The all-in-one open source security scanner
by maybebill on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @05:54PM
(#38466473)
I host https://www.defectdojo.org/ in my org and send all our scanner results to that, it’s worked very well. I believe Trivy scan results are supported natively too. The only part that took much work was developing a workflow to automatically scan images with Trivy and then send the results to DefectDojo.
FWIW, here’s a link to supported scans. https://documentation.defectdojo.com/integrations/parsers/fi...
Re:Trivy: The all-in-one open source security scanner
by zufallsheld on Thursday November 30, 2023 @01:02AM
(#38470208)
To automatically send vulnerability reports from Kubernetes using the trivy-operator, we developed a small operator that does the sending automatically: https://github.com/telekom-mms/trivy-dojo-report-operator
Re:Trivy: The all-in-one open source security scanner
by sonicanatidae on Friday December 01, 2023 @12:11PM
(#38489215)
I'm asking. Isn't there a trade off here?
The specialized apps do a better job, but take longer to parse, or is it just a PITA for no reason?
Re:Trivy: The all-in-one open source security scanner
by jonfw on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @10:13AM
(#38613206)
We're part of a big company that has company-wide standards, and our business unit has it's own more specific standards, and there's enough conflict there that I can't imagine we'll ever be unified.
Even if we did have a unified standard, it'd be a nightmare to move our legacy stuff over, and then it would be anybody's guess how well the standard would hold up over time w/ new controls and compliance programs being added