> defensively protecting themselves
Not everyone agrees with your point of view, to say the least:
http://www.fosspatents.com/2012/02/after-apple-microsoft-als... http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/04/03/eu-opens-two-antitrust...
My last look at the agreement[1] the last time this came up did not come across a provision for that sort of thing (especially before it was even approved by the justice department), but it's been a while. In the meantime, Motorola's board certainly can and will act as the want, good ideas be damned.
[1] http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1495569/00011931251122580...
As for the idea that they can and will act as they want - that's obviously not true. For example, what if they decided to sue the other Android licensees as they threatened to do before the acquisition?
Do you think the person who decided to do that would have a great future once the acquisition was completed?
How is Google squeezing every last dollar out of their patent portfolio? By defensively protecting themselves against offensive patent suits?