News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on SDXL Turbo: A Real-Time Text-to-Image Generation Model. Parent comment

Re:SDXL Turbo: A Real-Time Text-to-Image Generation Model by CaptainFever on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @04:29AM (#38457314)
> AI generated CSAM is not prosecutable

This is true, though "AI CSAM" is an oxymoron. There is no abuse in the creation of such works, and such it is not abuse material, unless of course real children are involved.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:SDXL Turbo: A Real-Time Text-to-Image Generation Model by kmeisthax on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @10:59AM (#38461075)
The post I was replying to specifically cited a Spanish AI CSAM ring that did, in fact, involve real child victims: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-66877718
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:SDXL Turbo: A Real-Time Text-to-Image Generation Model by CaptainFever on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @11:06AM (#38461160)
Damn, that sucks.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:SDXL Turbo: A Real-Time Text-to-Image Generation Model by godelski on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @03:19PM (#38464695)
I get your argument, but there are definitely laws about cartoon underage characters. Agree or disagree the difference is that today you don't need to be a highly skilled artist to make something that people are going to fap to. (I definitely agree priority should be focused on physical abuse and the people making the content, but this whole subject is touchy).
[ Parent | on HN ]