News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Charlie Munger has died by paxys on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @06:02PM (#38452800)
Value investing is a strategy. Index funds are a vehicle. The two can and do coexist, even more so than any other such pair because their risk profile (conservative) and time horizon (long term) are so well aligned.
Re:Charlie Munger has died by DennisP on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @07:07PM (#38453519)
Exactly. What makes it index investing is low fees and simple, objective stock selection without human judgement. There are various well-studied criteria for value stocks.

An S&P500 index does stock selection too, it's just picking large-cap stocks instead of value stocks.

Re:Charlie Munger has died by kikokikokiko on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @09:02PM (#38454510)
Large/Small are not correlated to value/growth. I for instance, invest pretty much all my money on ETFs such as ISCV, that invest on companies that fit the small and the value criteria. Over the decades, these two factors combined seemed to be the ones that on average gave the most returns.
Re:Charlie Munger has died by DennisP on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @09:30AM (#38459726)
I didn't claim they are correlated. I said some funds select based on value, and others based on size. Some do both.
Re:Charlie Munger has died by eru on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @10:26AM (#38460560)
> [...] objective stock selection without human judgement.

That's not completely true. The indices can involve plenty of human judgement, the S&P500 does, for example.

Re:Charlie Munger has died by chollida1 on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @07:36PM (#38453800)
> Value investing is a strategy. Index funds are a vehicle.

Yes, that's correct. They are orthogonal concepts.