Re:Rustlantis: Semantic fuzzing of the Rust compiler and int...
by hu3 on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @05:08PM
(#38452050)
I can and do dismiss non-constructive criticism, based on HN guidelines.
Literally the first two lines about comment etiquete:
> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.
> Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.
Re:Rustlantis: Semantic fuzzing of the Rust compiler and int...
by mcronce on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @03:59PM
(#38451224)
It was also explicitly stated to be a joke. There's really nothing wrong with that.
Re:Rustlantis: Semantic fuzzing of the Rust compiler and int...
by hu3 on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @05:16PM
(#38452176)
Not all jokes are harmless. Specially the flamebait prone ones. Take a look at the site guidelines about it.
Moderation is active and monitors this kind of behavior. For example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38410031
Re:Rustlantis: Semantic fuzzing of the Rust compiler and int...
by unflxw on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @06:04PM
(#38452826)
That doesn't mean that the people working to _improve_ PHP are doing anything wrong. Sisyphean, perhaps.
Re:Rustlantis: Semantic fuzzing of the Rust compiler and int...
by lmm on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @06:52PM
(#38453382)
There's a legitimate accelerationist view that improving PHP does more harm than good, by delaying people's migration away from it.
Re:Rustlantis: Semantic fuzzing of the Rust compiler and int...
by hu3 on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @07:13PM
(#38453575)
There are legitimate views both ways. It's called an opinion.
Besides, bashing languages rarely lead to constructive conversations. That's exactly why guidelines and moderators discourage it.
PHP is not a very good language. Yes, even modern PHP.