News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:That time Verisign typo-squatted all of .com and .net by mjan22640 on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @05:19AM (#38444295)
How does that total privacy work?
Re:That time Verisign typo-squatted all of .com and .net by immibis on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @07:25AM (#38444962)
Advanced cryptography. OTOH:

* Each transaction is signed by a "ring signature", where it's known that 1 of a set of 8 keys signed the transaction, but not which one. This is your actual input plus 7 other random inputs drawn from the same probability distribution as actual inputs.

* Double-spending is prevented by a "key image" which is something mathematically related to your actual key (not sure how that's verified without knowing which key it is). Each key image can only be used once, or it's a double-spend.

* Input amounts and output amounts have to balance using some kind of zero-knowledge proof.

Re:That time Verisign typo-squatted all of .com and .net by richardwhiuk on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @06:59AM (#38444816)
It doesn't.
Re:That time Verisign typo-squatted all of .com and .net by LoganDark on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @03:08PM (#38450555)
When you make a transaction on the Monero network, only the actual sender and recipient know the sender, recipient, or value of the transaction. This makes tumblers unnecessary and removes that whole ethical burden. If your Monero is ethically sourced (i.e. you mined it or bought it with your own money) then you can safely spend it without being subject to any tracking.