News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Linexjlin/GPTs: leaked prompts of GPTs by ShamelessC on Monday November 27, 2023 @09:53PM (#38441718)
Is that the sort of thing they would actually let you publish? Seems like inexperienced users might wind up really screwing up their inbox.
Re:Linexjlin/GPTs: leaked prompts of GPTs by fassssst on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @01:21AM (#38442968)
OpenAI would probably let you publish it (they have no review process today) but Google probably wouldn’t.

I don’t care though because I’m making these for myself.

Re:Linexjlin/GPTs: leaked prompts of GPTs by swyx on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @03:07PM (#38450541)
mind sharing the code? just for curiosity. keen to improve my email productivity.
Re:Linexjlin/GPTs: leaked prompts of GPTs by fassssst on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @08:27AM (#38459045)
The crazy thing is there is no code! The instructions are just “you are a helpful email assistant. You search the user’s gmail in response to their questions” and you just paste in the OpenAPI spec and OAuth details for gmail into the GPT maker form. I asked GPT-4 to write the OpenAPI spec for the gmail API’s necessary to search my inbox.
Re:Linexjlin/GPTs: leaked prompts of GPTs by swyx on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @01:53PM (#38463516)
ahhh i assumed there was some custom coding required for the OpenAPI spec
Re:Linexjlin/GPTs: leaked prompts of GPTs by thegiogi on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @02:04AM (#38443215)
You pass an open api spec on creation. You can remove all methods you fear may be risky, and leave it enough so that he can read your emails or calendar, if you feel comfortable with that